Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salil Singhal (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Salil Singhal
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Timberlack (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Timberlack (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Timberlack (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Timberlack (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete being rich, receiving awards and representing an organisation doesn't establish nobility. RationalPuff (talk) 22:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Nominator has been blocked as a UPE sock. Blablubbs | talk 20:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Hulatam (talk) 12:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * keep has some major wp:rs economic times, business today. Article is written poorly needs rewriting.ImNotAnEntrepreneur (talk) 02:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * — ImNotAnEntrepreneur (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The account was created shortly before adding this vote. RationalPuff (talk) 09:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * comment:, has some reliable sources like economic times, bloomberg,search over google would demonstrate more sources. It can be edited and improved. Per wp:atd if it can be edited it shouldn’t be deleted. this is not a SPA. ImNotAnEntrepreneur (talk) 12:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable. The sources are woeful hence the delete.   scope_creep Talk  12:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.