Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saliwahan Sikarwar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Stifle (talk) 13:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Saliwahan Sikarwar

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm really not sure what this page is about. It just seems to ba ramblings about two villages in india which have nothing to do with the subject matter. This might be CSD-able as patent nonsense, but I'm bringing this here in the case that someone can de-crap-ify this article and make it understandable. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 19:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I just ran a couple of Google searches and kept coming back to this article. Obvious problems with WP:RS and WP:V. Ecoleetage (talk) 19:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   —Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:04, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Not sure what Saliwahan Sikarwar is (a person?) but the village of Bhagwanpur seems to exist. I suggest moving the article to the title Bhagwanpur, Bihar as a start and bringing it to the attention of Wikiproject India. It is tagged for improvement. There is already an article on Chainpur, India so the text about this place in the article could be removed. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Tagged for WP India. I've seen several times in the past that articles about some of the less urban areas of India start out like this, with more emphasis on historical or legendary events that occurred at the location. I do understand that it can look like random statements to those of us who don't have prior knowledge of the tradition from which they arise. Once tagged they tend to be brought into normal standards. Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  21:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The "Sikarwar" article shows that Saliwahan Sikarwar was a ruler of the district. I have added this. However I couldn't find any reliable sources. I have added a request for comments at WikiProject India. Axl (talk) 07:16, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Move to Bhagwanpur: Saliwahan Sikarwar does not seem to be notable enough for a separate article, anyway he is mentioned in Sikarwar page. Also information on Chainpur should be removed. Its a different place. It seems that the guy who started this article simply by copying from here did not understand what he was doing. --GDibyendu (talk) 08:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or split -clearly this information should not be in the same article  The Bald One       White cat 12:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Edit and Keep : It has a place in Category-Villages_in_Bihar Villages_in_Bihar. Manoj nav (talk) 21:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.