Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salluit Airport


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot 00:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Salluit Airport
Passes google test, but a very light article and not a likely topic Wikipedia readers would search for. --How dare you? 04:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, though I would prefer additions be made to solidify my resolve. Michael 04:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, assuming it will someday get fleshed out. --Rehcsif 18:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep; airports are usually considered notable, and this one is certainly verifiable. I am a member of WikiProject Airports and I'll see if we are keeping a cleanup/expansion list (I know there's one for airports with commercial service, not sure if this one does). --MCB 06:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand this article. -- Big  top  06:42, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and please expand. Hektor 06:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above comments rootology 08:14, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I created the thing so what else am I going to say. Airports, like schools, are notable as such and at least this one has a sked service. I've added some info here. I created stubs for all Canadian airports and was suprised that several of them have been edited by other users. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:36, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. -- Jared Hunt July 30, 2006, 10:16 (UTC)
 * Keep - expansion would help. Williamborg (Bill) 14:14, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for now and give it time to grow. If later we find it hasn't grown much, we can always find somewhere to merge it. Jacqui ★ 14:26, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as verifiable and per all above. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 15:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, contingent on the expansion of the article in the future. Acyso 21:10, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - intrinsically notable topic. Metamagician3000 11:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above comments. It is unclear to me what the rationale for deletion is.  Yamaguchi先生 08:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - useful information on air transportation infrastructure.--DawnTreader 03:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - bad faith nomination. I wouldn't advise a block of User:How dare you?, but a test2 or test3 warning maybe.  --Harrison V 19:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.