Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally Davies (artist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Thanks everyone for your participation. Please assume good faith with this closure! SarahStierch (talk) 16:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Sally Davies (artist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD contested because it's "not clear the subject fails GNG", but the reason for PROD was that this is an unsourced WP:BLP. Which it is. Guy (Help!) 19:41, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 21:22, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete unless the article sees significant sourcing improvement by closure. An article doesn't have to "clearly" fail WP:GNG to get deleted, if it clearly fails WP:BLP. Although that said, you probably should have used blp prod instead of regular prod when prodding it — that process offers much less latitude for subjective personal opinions to enter into the matter. Bearcat (talk) 00:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Not an 'Unsourced BLP' because coverage of her work since the 1990s is listed at the bottom of the page. Granted some of it will no doubt be images only, but the Daily Mail features for example give biographical information and show she has been noticed internationally. Needs a "No footnotes" template, not an AfD. Sionk (talk) 00:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. In addition to the Daily Mail, her McDonalds Happy Meal project has received some attention as well. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, The Daily Mail, Happy Meal sources above, and even a few images at PDN reach just over GNG in my view. --j⚛e deckertalk 15:50, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.