Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally Freud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 16:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Sally Freud

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I came across this article whilst I was looking up australian authors for my wife, and I don't think it meets the notability guidelines. Firstly, it's an unreferenced BLP, and there are very few google hits for Sally Freud - a google search for '"Sally Freud" caged'- not something I wish to discover pictures of, by the way, but the title of one of her novels! then there are just 246 hits, whilst her book "the middle of nowhere" gets just 96. Me and my wife been looking at the notability guideline for authors, and I don't think this article passes - and neither does she. We were just talking about it whilst she was making my ham sandwiches and so I thoght I'd send it along to AFD. Let me know what ya all think - but as the nominator, we are going to be going for a solid delete. All the best, Hands of gorse, heart of steel (talk) 17:46, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:BIO says "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." The current article is an and . The single "reference" included is to Football Teams in Alien Territory, which isn't about her. Similarly, How James Freud survived rock and roll is about her husband and only briefly mentions her. WorldCat shows each of her books as being in between 50-74 libraries, which is insufficient to pass WP:AUTHOR. I don't see what criteria she passes, if any. (And no, I do not understand how two married people can each have an article, but neither article links to the other. Huh?) Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 04:45, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * delete The subject has not drawn enough outside coverage to warrent an article. I have searched and have failed to produce sources able to verify information on the page, and I don't feel it is likely that notability guidelines will be met unless more are brought forward. Mrathel (talk) 22:36, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.