Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally Jackson (Percy Jackson)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Percy Jackson & The Olympians.  MBisanz  talk 03:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Sally Jackson (Percy Jackson)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of Percy Jackson & The Olympians through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 03:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. --DAJF (talk) 03:44, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge I agree this article is useless, but i do not understand the nomination: i see no plot summary, excessive or otherwise, and I fail to understand the last sentence. Whether the character is notable depends on the importance of the book, and the articles on it don't even make that clear. This whole group of articles needs some careful attention, and scattered deletion isn't going to do it--we should rather be conserving and merging he fragments in the hope of getting the start for one decent article on the series Ditto for all the related. This is not the way to build the encyclopedia--more help for those struggled with this is the way. DGG (talk) 07:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per DGG.John Z (talk) 13:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge, for the same reasons Laurent paris (talk) 21:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per DGG. -- Mvuijlst (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.