Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salsa shark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 08:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Salsa shark

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I prodded this, but quickly discovered it had already been prodded. Anyway, I think it's unencyclopedic and has little potential for improvement. It is also an orphan, with no pages at all linking to it. - furrykef (Talk at me) 01:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like it's basically an extension of a quote from Clerks. --Wafulz 01:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think it's notable and if it is, it needs links and more info. Captain panda   In   vino   veritas  01:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  03:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)'
 * Delete per nom. /Blaxthos 06:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - i was going to say WP:NFT... but per Wafulz it appears to be a reference to the movie clerks. I haven't seen the movie, and i think most people who haven't would also agree that the article does little to establish notability of the topic. THE KING 09:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Throwaway line from a movie. I think it pretty much proves Wikipedia has already covered everything when people resort to writing about things like this. Wavy G 18:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think it was a "resort" so much as a casual user simply thinking the line was funny and that, therefore, it should be written about. But whatever. :) - furrykef (Talk at me) 21:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Clerks (movie) - Richard Cavell 22:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable, I don't see the point of making sure that anyone that searches salsa shark gets clerks either. Lotusduck 22:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and do not redirect to Clerks or anywhere else. RFerreira 02:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete completely This really has no place whatsoever on an encyclopaedia. Suriel1981 12:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete this for heavenssake, honestly now. Burntsauce 17:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.