Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salt&Light Radio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. (A7 Web content) NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 06:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Salt&Light Radio

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable internet radio station. This article has been repeatedly recreated several times and was speedily deleted three times. Article has been reposted by a User:DjJosh sockpuppet. WayKurat (talk) 22:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons.:


 * Speedy delete web content without even so much as an attempt to show notability. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:35, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all as non-notable. Non-notable internet radio station, non-notable dj, non-notable everything! If it was speedied on the Tagalog Wikipedia, what more here? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete just not notable. VirtualRevolution (talk) 14:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete all, as above. Also, the creator of that article is a likely violator of WP:OWN, especially as he insists that the trademark symbol be included in the name and is identified as an internet station. -- azumanga (talk) 16:27, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete with Salt but not Light... No indication of notability. Probably promotional. I've just tried looking for sources. Why did I bother? The name does intrigue me. Just a little. Not enough to find out why. Peridon (talk) 20:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.