Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saltängen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Snow Keep Non Admin Close  D u s t i SPEAK!! 04:20, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Saltängen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't seem notable enough. StaticGull Talk  17:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, David Eppstein (talk) 04:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep- A borough of a moderately big city should be important enough. Much more info needed on this article, though. Failing this will merit a delete Arbiteroftruth (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong keep - you do realise this is an entire borough, I take it? Since even the tiniest villages are usually regarded as speedy keeps, an entire borough is eminently article-worthy. Grutness...wha?  06:38, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Saltängen is a borough and the fact that it is a short article does not merit deletion (unless there is absolutely no context, then it would fall under WP:CSD but there is context so this is not an issue). Maybe a Swedish speaker would like to translate sv:Saltängen (which I presume is about the same thing) which is significantly longer article (even if it is still  stub) Anonymous101 (talk) 07:42, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Geographic locations are generally considered inherently notable. While the content in this article could be expanded, the lack of article size is not grounds for deletion Steve Crossin   (contact)  09:40, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per this discussion. This is a borough of the tenth largest city in Sweden - it's just not going to be deleted. WilliamH (talk) 12:15, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, real-world places are inherently notable. J I P  | Talk 19:01, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.