Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salt (Wuthering Heights album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Sandstein  07:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Salt (Wuthering Heights album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

With Wuthering Heights (band) deleted, I find it hard to rationalize its album is notable. Only the allmusic reference on the article now is reliable but does not confer notability. Curb Chain (talk) 07:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (converse)  @ 08:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Note Articles for deletion/Wuthering Heights (band), currently leaning "keep"; the article had been deleted via prod but then restored, so we can consider the first sentence of this nomination struck. As for the second, in addition to the Allmusic review mentioned I found another review here that was published in the Seattle Post Intelligencer, and it was nominated by Metal Storm for one of its awards here. Just what I found from a quick search. postdlf (talk) 04:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/Wuthering Heights (band) has now been closed as keep. So with the band notable and multiple sources found, it looks like we don't have any deletion rationale left. postdlf (talk) 05:59, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  06:28, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to Wuthering Heights (band). A couple of reviews from reliable sources but not enough content for a standalone article. --Michig (talk) 07:02, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.