Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salt lake eagle gate apartments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Userfy. Moved to User:Southidaho/Salt lake eagle gate apartments (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Salt lake eagle gate apartments

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

CSD for notability declined by (fine, it's not technically CSD-able). Non-notable apartment complex containing biographies of non-notable people. KuroiShiroi (talk) 18:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I am not sure where this falls. The writing of the article is so bad it is hard to tell the exact meaning that is intended. However, some notability seems to be asserted, such as being the home of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday Saints (though the current president doesn't live there). Definately needs a rewrite, both to understand the content and to remove the POV language ("the prophet") from the article. Not sure if this is a keep or delete, but most likely delete. The   Seeker 4   Talk  18:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep if sourced My only problem here is with sources. IF they can be found to support the material in the article, the apartments are notable for the very high concentration of notable figures living there, as a major residential center for Mormon dignitaries. DGG (talk) 18:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Aside from being totally unclear there doesn't seem to be any meaningful assertion of notability here. The fact that several 'church leaders' are asserted to have lived there at some point is not adequate grounds for notability.  As far as I can tell there are no news articles on this complex or anything similar source-wise to establish notability or even to verify the article.  As a result, in addition to the notability issue, it appears that the article is likely entirely original research. Locke9k (talk) 20:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. It doesn't seem to have anything notable about it, other than it seems to be residence of some higher ups in the LDS church.  Some clarity on this would be a good thing.  Just because Spencer W. Kimball lived there, though, doesn't mean it's notable. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 23:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy. The article has its faults, but it's been around for just a day without any significant edits by anyone besides (the original creator). Let's not be bitey and give them a chance to fix it. - Mgm|(talk) 10:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * userfy per MacGyverMagic. It looks likely to be notable, but I can't prove it.  so let the author try to do so. Hobit (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.