Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saltrubbed Eyes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Seance (band). This article is at AfD as well, if it gets deleted, the redirect should be speedied.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:55, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Saltrubbed Eyes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:ENN and no assertion of notability. An Allmusic rating is not sufficient to meet WP:NALBUMS. MSJapan (talk) 05:56, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Seance (band). I found enough to justify notability for the band, but there's really not enough here to assert notability for the album independently of the band itself. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Seance (band). We have far too many of these album articles where people have unable or unwilling to go beyond a track listing and an infobox. The Allmusic review could be cited in the article on the band. There isn't enough to justify an article on this album. --Michig (talk) 09:30, 16 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.