Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salty Walrus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per WP:SNOW. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 06:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Salty Walrus

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete unsourced sexual slang term that doesn't seem to be improve-able having been given 2 months' warning and still no sources - if we find reliable sources that's fine, but haven't yet and prospects seem bleak. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Eww. Delete per WP:NEO, unsourced and unverifiable neologism. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * edit conflicted Delete Even though I declined the speedy too, I also could find no sources.  Dloh  cierekim  04:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article ruined walruses for me. And on another note, it's a non-notable neologism. J- ſtan TalkContribs 04:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no refs, not encyclopedic, nn.--MONGO (talk) 04:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NN --rogerd (talk) 05:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Super salty delete - per Ten Pound Hammer. Seriously, salt it to avoid certain recreation. You know it's going to come back and squirt us in the eye. - Crockspot (talk) 05:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I was waiting til someone said salt it. LOL Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NEO. Ew, put it under the bed sheets! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 05:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, and... ew. Okay that's not a good rationale... but no WP:RS, possibly WP:OR, WP:NOT, WP:NEO, etc. Ariel  ♥  Gold  05:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Clear delete - no refs, no sources, and appears to be something made up in school one day. - Philippe &#124; Talk 05:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable (will he go for the horrible pun?) neolojism! (yes, yes he will. should this vote be 'snowballed' too? ) ThuranX (talk) 05:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete dumb. JuJube (talk) 06:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as ridiculously non-notable. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 06:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - also, lol, snowballed. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 06:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.