Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salvatore Rich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Per WP:CSD, this article was created in violation of a block, and the article has no substantial contributions from other editors. Mz7 (talk) 20:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Salvatore Rich

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

completely and utterly non-notable vanity spam created by an xwiki vanity spam sock. SANTADICAE🎅 19:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanispamcruft. Mccapra (talk) 21:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete — non notable as they lack in-depth significant coverage in secondary reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 03:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Wow, this is really a poorly written article. And it is nonsensical. Seems like this piece of junk could have been speedied. Liz Read! Talk! 04:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. spam--  Ts12rAc talk to me 15:45, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG, lacks in-depth coverageJuggyevil (talk) 19:31, 22 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.