Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:28, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The notability is in the cases they dealt with. Every single one of the references are about the cases, not about the firm. The article is indistinguishable from what law firms use for advertising.  DGG ( talk ) 04:39, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree with DGG. What is needed is coverage of the topic--and the subject of the article is not List of successful court cases .... . Drmies (talk) 04:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I reviewed the sources and none directly deal with the subject and therefore the requirements of CORP are not met. SmartSE (talk) 09:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete The coverage is only about the cases and not about the firm.Law firms advertise there successful cases to promote themselves as in the case here done by a Paid Editor. Clearly promotional  and fails WP:CORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:ADVERT and no notability, as notability isn't inherited from their court cases. Fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:44, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.