Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Air


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. discarding the keep votes as a)notability by assertion, b)needs better referencing is a reason to delete not keep c) aboiding redlinks isn't a policy reason to keep. The delete side demonstrate a clear policy basis - lack of sources and due diligence in finding such sources. I have no objection to recreation if sources are found. Spartaz Humbug! 06:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Sam Air

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Charter airline (with only one plane) of questionable notability. Google search on "Sam Air" Bratislava shows a lot of results, but no significant coverage - primarily simple directory listings. Google news search shows zero results. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 18 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: Article creator is WP:SPA and very likely WP:COI. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:12, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 21:38, 25 November 2011 (UTC)




 * Weak keep Probably meets wp:notability with sources in Slovakia although not established in this article. Probably a COI editor, but the content is encyclopedic. North8000 (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep an airline operator of Boeing 737 should have an article it just needs better referencing and expansion rather than deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The airline is operational, so it is likely to be included in airport destination lists. If the article was deleted, there would be a red link, and I think that the reader of a destination list should be informed about the airlines listed there. I pretty well now this creates a problem if/when the airline gets defunct, but I hope that further notability can be established through adding of third-party sources. --AdAstra reloaded (talk) 13:36, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete My reading of the only source is that it's routine coverage of a new airline / route. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:23, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.