Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Deering


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 12:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Sam Deering

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:ATHLETE like Callum Reynolds and other pages made by this user - Spiderone (talk) 17:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Spiderone (talk) 17:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete player has not played in a fully-professional league. Thus fails WP:ATHLETE. Lack of any independent sources means he fails WP:GNG too. --Jimbo[online] 17:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:N. GiantSnowman 17:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom and reinforced by the extremely POV language of the article, e.g. "promising young winger who has come through the youth team ranks. Able to play on either flank. Sam has pace, flair and an eye for goal." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miskaton (talk • contribs) 18:09, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom RP459 (talk) 18:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 19:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:ATHLETE. Joe Chill (talk) 23:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, played a number of games for one of the biggest teams in a notable league Eldumpo (talk) 21:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. The Conference is notable, yes, but not all the players there are notable. This has been discussed before. Spiderone (talk) 08:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, I am the creater of this page and think i have done a good job and have added a reference to his page, what harm is the page doing? Oxford United are a proffesional team and full time players so i think it should be kept.Bazzhard (talk) 12:58, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I see no reason for this to be kept and for other very similar Conference players' articles to be deleted. Spiderone (talk) 08:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment But is there a reason for it to be deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bazzhard (talk • contribs) 12:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes there is, he fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:N. Spiderone (talk) 12:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Okay i understand that so this page may be deleted.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.