Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Kantimathi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 16:34, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Sam Kantimathi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Procedural nomination. Proposed for deletion as "not notable, as suggested by someone way back in 2007 -- still not notable now in 2011" but not eligible as it had been previously prodded.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - There are other people also selling clocks for Scrabble play, Sam has no special notability in this regard. There are many other people that have won various minor Scrabble tournaments around the world, Sam has no special notability in this regard either. And trying to combine the two (some minor wins and selling Scrabble clocks) does not make this person notable. HumphreyW (talk) 00:35, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: If this page is deleted then the two redirect pages should also be deleted, SamTimer and Pocket SamTimer. HumphreyW (talk) 00:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable in any regard. - SudoGhost (talk) 01:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Scrabble. Guiness World Records recognizes him as having played the highest opening score in 1993 which predates the same play noted in the Scrabble article (I'm off to add that info). -- Whpq (talk) 16:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Brand's Crossword Game King's Cup is not a minor tournament, and he won it against strong competition. He was also the pioneer for the clock used in the largest tournaments and world championships. But delete it if you want, I don't care. Sandman30s (talk) 09:28, 25 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I see some curious claims here, but nothing that is A) sourced to a reliable third party or B) meets the criteria in the General Notability Guideline which this subject applies.  PlusPlusDave (talk) 22:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.