Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Malcolm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Sam Malcolm

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject doesn't meet notability criteria outlined at WP:BIO. Most of the references are not independent of the subject. Those that are independent are either local news stories and/or they barely mention the subject. Nothing qualifies as "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". All the contributors to article content are SPAs, including one whose name suggests this is self-promotion. Edgeweyes (talk) 23:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as the current article is not better convincing of any applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  04:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as evidenced by information of above. Fails WP:BIO and WP:NOTABILITY. Amccann421 (talk) 04:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Winning an International Jugglers' Assocation Numbers Competition is judged only on technical ability and not for showmanship, so his awards in the Individual Rings Numbers Competition Malcolm’s technical juggling ability (see Sport (competitive) juggling ), which is noteworthy enough to have won medals two years in the numbers competition. As IJA is “dedicated to advance the art of juggling worldwide” ; Malcolm’s raising the bar in the Individual Rings Numbers Juggling Competition is raising the bar for jugglers worldwide to beat. This makes him a noteworthy technical juggler. JillCDeBiase (talk) 16:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete': Doesn't meet GNG. Merely being a competent professional in your field is not the standard for having a Wikipedia article.--Milowent • hasspoken  16:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.