Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Rosen (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  00:35, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Sam Rosen (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no assertion or establishment of notability made here. Mr. Rosen fails WP:NACTOR since he does not have significant roles in multiple notable films, no cult following, nor does he have other unique contributions. -- Tavix ( talk ) 00:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 00:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - According to the references provided, Sam Rosen is an actor of only local interest. The references themselves declare him to be non-notable (in the wider world). Fieari (talk) 03:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Notability established by cited sources. Local coverage/interest is acceptable for satisfying WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR (WP:NCORP and WP:NPOLITICIAN require wider geographic notability). WP:NACTOR is met by roles in Stuck Between Stations and Actor's and Sin The Oranges (film). ~Kvng (talk) 21:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks like you're partially referring to a different actor. The Sam Rosen nominated wasn't born in 1952, so he couldn't have starred in Actor's and Sin. -- Tavix ( talk ) 21:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You're right. I fixed that bad wikilink. I have just linked him to The Oranges (film) to demonstrate he meets the multiple requirement of WP:NACTOR. IMDB indicates there are probably others. ~Kvng (talk) 23:34, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as the two source seem to be reliable and significant. However, this is a mini stub and doesn't do the actor many favours and urgently needs expanding using the sources given. Atlantic306 (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Notable actor. Article needs much work to improve. Thanks Karl Twist (talk) 12:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep article needs work, not deletion. sources seem adequate.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  00:04, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.