Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Smith (ice hockey)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:11, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Sam Smith (ice hockey)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 22:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NHOCKEY as the EIHL is a top professional league Seasider91 (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * look at WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment. He doesn't pass WP:NHOCKEY.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:14, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Whether the EIHL is a fully professional league (something currently under debate at the WikiProject) is irrelevant. At the most generous, he's played a relatively small number of games without achieving particular distinction, and would fail the most generous conceivable criterion of WP:NHOCKEY.  No evidence the player meets the GNG beyond routine match coverage explicitly debarred by WP:ROUTINE.   Ravenswing   09:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I see no indication he meets GNG. Resolute 17:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.