Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Wheat syndrome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Sam Wheat syndrome
Original research, Google search shows 18 results, all but one are Wikipedia derived.Ckessler 18:44, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - interesting idea, but a neologism nonetheless, and not a widespread one at that. HumbleGod 19:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. No evidence that this term is in common use. --Metropolitan90 20:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism. By the way, I'm not convinced this particular flavour of the phenomenon is a cliché, and I'm not convinced that the examples cited are faithful to the article's definition. Looking at Shakespeare's oeuvre, could we say that the ghost of Hamlet's father or King Macbeth suffered from 'Sam Wheat syndrome?' --die Baumfabrik 00:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.