Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samad (crater)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sourcing/hoax concerns appear to have been addressed. (non-admin closure)  Gongshow  Talk 03:04, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Samad (crater)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Hoax/mistake? Google found only mirrors of Wikipedia, without sources since 2005 and with unreferenced stub template since 2009. Bulwersator (talk) 14:12, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Tagged as by TenPoundHammer Bulwersator (talk) 15:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * And there is entire category of similar articles (Category:Impact craters on Enceladus). Also images are without sources Bulwersator (talk) 15:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - this is not a hoax, it appears in the IAU Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature. I have added a reference to the article. JohnCD (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article is now referenced and the image was uploaded by trusted editor User:Volcanopele -- Kheider (talk) 16:21, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/Feature/5288 Any question? Tycho Magnetic Anomaly-1 (talk) 21:20, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, article is OK Bulwersator (talk) 22:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep – valid feature and name, but not much in the way of published content. Regards, RJH (talk) 18:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.