Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samanta Gorzelniak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Samanta Gorzelniak

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The person does not meet the notability criteria for authors, scientists, or translators. There is only one published thesis and one published translation. There is no secondary reception of the work. It's not clear why this page should exist in the English Wikipedia as there is no text relating to this person published in English. The publication list lacks ISBN numbers and sources. The page was deleted on the German Wikipedia after a deletion discussion that can be looked up there and that concluded that the notability criteria were not being met. Erdpferd (talk) 07:54, 14 May 2022 (UTC)


 * deletion discussion and decision from May 11th, 2022 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:L%C3%B6schkandidaten/10._April_2022#Samanta_Gorzelniak_(gel%C3%B6scht) Erdpferd (talk) 07:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Which ended in deletion I think? No pl wiki article, for the record. Pl wiki, for the record, is pretty inclusive and recognizes anyone with habilitation as notable, but I don't see indication that she has habilitation. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, the discussion ended in deletion. The discussion was non controversial: only the original author of the article wanted to keep the article, every other person who participated in the discussion agreed that the notability criteria were not met. She has no habilitation, only a dissertation. Erdpferd (talk) 09:13, 14 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, Germany,  and Poland. Shellwood (talk) 07:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication of meeting WP:NPROF or WP:NBIO. Not all academics are notable. Google Scholar does not suggest her work has any impact. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:00, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. A quick Google book search shows interesting results both in German and Englisch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NearEMPTiness (talk • contribs) 10:43, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. sigh The message above about a Google book search, which is not signed, is from the article's author. He's been using similar arguments on the German Wikipedia deletion discussion. EDIT: The book search even lists a book that says "Texts of the following authors were not included: Samanta Gorzelniak" as well as books of other people with the same family name.
 * Erdpferd (talk) 12:21, 14 May 2022 (UTC) UPDATED Erdpferd (talk) 12:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. For the sake of context, is the one who nominated this article for deletion on de-wiki, and, who left the unsigned "keep" comment above, is both the original creator of the de-wiki article and its translator into English on en-wiki. I did not take part in that deletion debate but, having read it, agree that no compelling (or even middling) reasons for Keep were provided. I do not see any interesting results in the Google books search link provided above, but I'd be happy to take a look at a WP:THREE selection of them if anyone really thinks there is WP:SIGCOV in there. -- asilvering (talk) 17:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete not every academic is notable, and when we have a google book search relying on things like a mention that no work from this writer was included in a publication, we really do not have sources to pass GNG and we have no claim that is even remotely close to passing academic notability. That could change, she is still a fairly early career academic, and it can be fairly long in an academics career before they reach notability, but there is no indication here that she meets any notability guidelines at present, and we cannot predict the future.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:46, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete seems like WP:TOOSOON to meet WP:NSCHOLAR or WP:NAUTHOR. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough notable per WP:NPROF or WP:NAUTHOR as per above consensus so far. ☆★  Mamushir   ( ✉✉ ) 03:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.