Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Rowley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Needs cleanup expansion and sourcing or else it will be back (non-admin closure) ( talk→  Bwilkins / BMW   ←track ) 10:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Samantha Rowley

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced, non-notable actress, bit-player is not notable.  MBisanz  talk 06:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I can source it, but I'm getting just 12 hits across the newspapers. All I can find is what's there, as well as her walking out of the television show "Trust Me: I'm A Holiday Rep" and being replaced by Paul Burrell and a trivial holiday mishap.  Hiding T 09:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I've added the sources, but I lean towards deletion. Hiding T 09:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Don't agree with absolute deletion, perhaps a move somewhere into the Hollyokas main page or minor/recurring characters would be better?--D-Weaving —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.63.116.72 (talk) 16:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep She had a non-minor role in Hollyoaks and its spinoff and placed in a major competition (it is my personal opinion that televised competitions with millions of viewers count as long as it is verifiable). The Holiday Rep thing was too short to be notable, but with the other stuff confirmed, it doesn't have to be. - Mgm|(talk) 10:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand and further source. Wiki does not care if minor, if coverage neets the GNG. Google News.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all coverage in the above google news search is trivial, and therefore this article does not meet the GNG. I can't find any sources that can serve as the backbone for this article without needing a synthesis to make sense.  Them  From  Space  16:46, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.