Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Schacher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Samantha Schacher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no substantive RS coverage of this person. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:19, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 03:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 03:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 03:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 03:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 03:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 03:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete no reliable sourcing, way below the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clarkcj12 (talk) 05:39, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete non notabe as either a "television, radio, and Internet host" or "producer". Does not meet WP:ANYBIO; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.