Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Youssef


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   No Consensus Per nom, notability may be marginal but not marginal enough to delete at this point. Rescue is the right approach. Mike Cline (talk) 20:50, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Samantha Youssef

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notability is marginal at best and author appears to have a COI issue. Eeekster (talk) 04:32, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 08:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. I have also formatted the references and added two sources. Silver  seren C 08:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Has worked in multiple notable films and the coverage in Wired magazine and MSN Entertainment just about satisfies WP:GNG--Sodabottle (talk) 12:45, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Wired magazine mentions her.  D r e a m Focus  05:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep She is recognized, as shown by the sources, by various notable publications, which states her notability. Silver  seren C 07:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If I am not mistaken, the above !vote has been canvassed here. --87.79.176.167 (talk) 21:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * That was not canvassing, he was asking me a legitimate question. I added most of the references for the page a while ago, so I do feel like it is a keep vote regardless, I just forgot to vote. Silver  seren C 21:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete there is not significant indepth coverage. there is a Youssef that went to a school called Gower, but when you discount that, no real coverage . LibStar (talk) 14:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, no decent references. The wired sexy geeks "article" is particularly worthless, since it's just apparently just a list of people that readers nominated, but the others aren't much better. -- Nuujinn (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I question that any of that coverage is significant enough to meet the guidelines--a mention alone in Wired is not enough, and the COI issue doesn't help. Shadowjams (talk) 05:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - The COI is hypothetical. Sources such as MSN, IMDB, IGDA and CG Con are recognized credentials. Soulweaver577 (talk) 02:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This user's two edits to this AfD page are their only contributions to Wikipedia. The account appears to hav ebeen specifically created to post the above comment. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - Borderline, but just squeaks over. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:45, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.