Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Same-sex marriage in Antarctica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete, by ANTARCTIC SNOW. I cannot imagine any sensible keep reason will be given. DGG (talk) 19:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Same-sex marriage in Antarctica

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N. Unsourced, no evidence this was ever discussed by anyone. Hekerui (talk) 10:00, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons given in the prod before it was removed. Pokerdance (talk/contribs) 10:07, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - nominated for prod for the same reasons. Conversation about a "null set".     7   talk   10:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 20-Mule-Team Delete: Another of those ridiculous "completist" articles along the lines of Mauritania at the Winter Olympics and Scouting in the Vatican that fail of any rational existence, let alone standards of notability. I have to admit that the section in the article seriously discussing whether homosexuality was restricted in a section once claimed by Nazi Germany (recognized by no other nation and officially lapsed in 1945) was ... unique, if nothing else.  Fails WP:V, WP:N and WP:BULLSHIT.   RGTraynor  11:42, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Goes without saying - blatant 'vandalism' Dvmedis (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. For the reasons stated in the prod and per RGTraynor. I would hesitate to call it vandalism, though, absent some evidence of bad faith. Tim Song (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:53, 23 July 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete I agree totally with RGTraynor-- the article is obnoxiously ridiculous. From the article "As there is no official government, there is no same-sex marriage in Antarctica, which is one of the seven continents."   By that standard, there ought to be an article called "Same-sex marriage on Mars".  I think this will be an Antarctic snowball. Mandsford (talk) 13:02, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete pure original research. ApprenticeFan  talk  contribs 15:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per common sense. This article is absurd. As RGTraynor said, fails WP:V, WP:N, and WP:BULLSHIT. Entirely OR.  Neil   Clancy  16:02, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as essentially non-existent concept. Stifle (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions.  --  treelo  radda  18:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.