Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samesame.com.au


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Samesame.com.au

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This doesn't seem to meet WP:NWEB. Some mentions in passing, yes, one source is a rewritten press relaese... if there are any reliable, in-depth sources discussing this website's significance, please showcase them here - I couldn't find any. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Unfortunately does not pass WP:GNG for this topic. Lack of WP:IS and WP:RS at this time to support notablility claims.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 (c)  22:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as varying international publications namedrop SameSame, but nothing to warrant Web Criteria. Secondly, site is no longer active. Burroughs&#39;10 (talk) 04:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.