Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samip Mallick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Samip Mallick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While this archivist has been interviewed in some media, I do not see any reason for him to be notable enough for Wikipedia. Most likely self-promotion. WP:BLP applies. Place Clichy (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Place Clichy (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Place Clichy (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Place Clichy (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Place Clichy (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Place Clichy (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete fails basic GNG. --Saqib (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 15:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve. Mallick is one of the go-to experts on South Asian American history, important in the field. I've worked on the page, and it's not self-promotion. (Asian American history is a relatively niche field, so as an editor, I'd appreciate suggestions on how to improve the article to better indicate notability.) Anirvan (talk) 18:05, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete- The subject does not appear to be notable. The majority of the coverage I found are about the archive.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Cubbie15fan (talk) 21:16, 28 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.