Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samir-André Lajoié


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Samir-André Lajoié

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced BLP. J04n(talk page) 17:24, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 17:24, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 17:24, 22 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete along with the unsourced section about him in Samir Al-Ajani. I can't find any references either and suspect this is a hoax. I can't find any evidence that the French soap-opera he allegedly acted in (Amor et Perte) ever existed. Some of the other details are also contradictory: the article claims that he was raised in New Caledonia (a very small island) and that he's lived in Australia since he was four. Pburka (talk) 22:17, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. I believe that Samir Al-Ajani is part of the same hoax. It was created by the same WP:SPA and is completely unsourced and unverifiable. I'm nominating it for deletion. Pburka (talk) 13:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Pburka No sources (reliable or otherwise) for any assertions in the article. The soap opera mentioned, even if you give the benefit of the doubt and assume that it had the more likely title Amour et Perte, or the talent show that allegedly discovered him, simply did not exist. This and the Samir Al-Ajani article are classic hoaxes by the same creator that slipped by.  FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 23:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable at best, probable hoax. Edward321 (talk) 13:47, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.