Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samiyah Amanquah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 15:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Samiyah Amanquah

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Possible hoax.

Heads up: I've removed a section on health problems. If this person is real, then it's a massive WP:BLP breach, and I'd rather be precautious in such a situation, as it's *very* contentious and had no sources.

My reason for believing this is a hoax: for starters, there is no such thing as the "Zoo modelling agency", only a lad's mag by that name. The timeline in the article is choppy: she starts modelling at 16, took time out (it said in the section I removed) from her career, then restarted her career while she was still 16? Pretty suspicious sounding. A google search brings up 9 results, none of which are third-party & reliable sources with which to establish notability, anyway. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 10:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability, even if this isn't a hoax. Edward321 (talk) 13:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. Unsourced BLP (hence the "strong" delete), with no Google hits except mirrors of this article. Given the recency of the article (and some of the since-removed claims about media coverage), the content seems highly dubious. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 01:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Possible hoax, but if the article were true, the subject would still not be notable. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.