Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sammie Rhodes (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:16, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Sammie Rhodes
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

acene awards no longer count so fails PORNBIO. There is an interview but that is a primary source and therefore fails GNG Spartaz Humbug! 07:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep as passes PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:42, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * How does this performer pass PORNBIO? She has lots of scene-related nominations, a scene-related win and 2 individual nominations. No individual-based award wins. Also, how does she pass GNG? Where is the non-trivial coverage by multiple independent reliable sources? An interview does not count. • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * , have you been hacked? What is there in this article to suggect that the subject meets either notability criteria? Tarc (talk) 14:43, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Nope afraid not lol, Work it out - When these PORNBIOs come up and I !vote Keep on one or two- What do I !vote Keep based on ? (and no not PB or GNG). – Davey 2010 Talk 14:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Well when you say as passes PORNBIO & GNG, one kinda assumes that that is your actual rationale. I'm going to  if you're WP:HOTTIE-voting again... Tarc (talk) 17:34, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * You see when you see my !votes on Pornbios you literally have to think outside the box, Actually I'm not sure why I never stated it above like I always do!, I know it's extremely sad!, I cam only hope one day my Hottie-Keep !votes won't be disregarded. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - passes PORNBIO & GNG. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   19:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as passes PORNBIO & GNG. --Hillary Scott`love (talk) 05:44, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * So far, just vague handwaves at policy without explaining why or how the suvect allaegedly meets them. Arguments to avoid. Tarc (talk) 14:43, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Subject does not, in fact, meet either the notability guide or WP:PORNBIO. Multiple nominations plus a scene-related award do not count, as pornbio quite clearly states....one does not make an apple into a banana by simply painting it yellow.  Next, the sources for the subject are largely porn industry news and press releases, e.g. announcements of roles and of nominations.  The one possibility is the interview in something called the "Beverly Hills Outlook", but whatever this is...tabloid, local news, or whatnot I have thus been unable to discover, as it no longer exists.  If we give it the benefit of the doubt, then that is just one reliable source, whereas the project's notability threshold is in-depth coverage by multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. Tarc (talk) 14:43, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per my comments above. Fails PORNBIO without award wins. Even if you count the porn trade press as reliable, this performer comes up short on GNG with coverage coming from one source (AVN). • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails PORNBIO with no award wins. No reliable sources to indicate she passes GNG. Finnegas (talk) 20:43, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete pretty much per Tarc. No indication that the "Beverly Hills Outlook" wasn't a selfr-published webzine that fails RS by a country light-year or two. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.