Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sammy’s Taste of Chicago


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:20, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Sammy’s Taste of Chicago

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail WP:ORGSIG and even WP:GNG. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:43, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 27 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep pending explanation. I don't understand the nomination rationale so please explain further. Of course all restaurants aren't notable (why ORGSIG)? Why is the reasoning that the articles in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Detroit News, and the West Allis News (another Journal Communications newspaper) aren't reliable such that it fails GNG? The first two are major newspapers of the United States.  Royal broil  03:14, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Regarding ORGSIG, I was referring to the second paragraph which says "... please consider whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment..." Also Notability (organizations and companies) also says "...Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability..." How many sources exist that aren't in that category? As for GNG, well, a few writeups aren't enough to constitute significant coverage. Lots of restaurants get a few reviews. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:18, 27 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I note no additions, no expansion, since the article was tagged for Afd on 26 July. --Bejnar (talk) 15:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete just another small regional chain, no lasting interest. Moderate, no in depth, coverage in occasional regional newspapers. Fails WP:GNG. By WP:ORGSIG he may mean that even if everyone in Pewaukee knows Sammy's, that the article still needs to meet Wikipedia's notability standards if it is to remain here; but he more likely meant that it fails WP:ORG, which it does. --Bejnar (talk) 15:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, it fails ORG, as I stated above. And, I'm not a "he". :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:NGO.   Jim Carter (from public cyber)  19:00, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.