Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sammy Rugg

__NOINDEX__ 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Sammy Rugg

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No credible assertions of notability. A blogger (is anybody not a blogger these days?), and a radio presenter (not specified for whom). Claims that Rugg "worked for" various major publications, but this claim is not supported by citation, nor is the nature of the work made clear (was she the managing editor, or the mailroom worker?). Other claims to fame are similarly vague. The "presenter" gig on "Tafe Radio" appears significant until one discovers that Tafe Radio is the student-run radio station at Petersham College where students broadcast as part of their curriculum. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG. The citations on the page make no mention of the individual. The West Street Journal and Tafe Radio appear to be student media. Article appears to be about a non-notable journalism student. Dac04 (talk) 17:14, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: this AfD was started 14 minutes after the article's creation. If it doesn't fit any of the speedy deletion criteria and cites sources, perhaps it is worth waiting to see whether more reliable sources can be found or provided. §everal⇒|Times 17:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Reliable sources about her do seem to be in very short supply. §everal⇒|Times 17:31, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment I would have nominated for speedy deletion, but given that sources were present, the speedy might well have been declined. (I've had it happen on all to many occasions that an editor will see sources and assume that a credible assertion of notability has been made without verifying the credibility of the sources.) Sometimes it's just easier to short cut the process and bring straight to AFD.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. The sources are just general links to website front pages and do not mention the subject, so I have removed them. I searched for sources, but can't find any reliable, non-trivial ones, and thus the subject fails the GNG. Since the sources were false I've nominated the article for speedy deletion under WP:A7 and we'll see. If that is declined then this AfD will take over. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 17:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete there are no sources contained within the article. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yamaguchi%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F&action=edit&amp;section=new Yamaguchi先生] 21:20, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as subject fails to cross the verifiability or notability thresholds. I declined the speedy request as an assertion of notability is made but am !voting delete because my search for sources failed to prove that assertion. (Also, her LinkedIn profile says she was in advertising, promotions, and sales while the Wikipedia article is written to imply that she was a journalist for these publications.) - Dravecky (talk) 22:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete no significant coverage in reliable sources. --99of9 (talk) 10:21, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.