Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sampoorna Rath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:05, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Sampoorna Rath

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just being a Fan of sports and also not having wp:sigcov won't make the subject enough notable to have a stand alone article.  Dtt1 Talk  16:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Dtt1 Talk  16:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.   Dtt1 Talk  16:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 15 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete A person with a collection is not notable, unless either the collection or the person is significant for some other reason. That doesn't seem to be the case here.— Shelf Skewed  Talk  22:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - owning a collection with 200 units is a run of the mill hobbyist. My ex-landlord has that many prints. Bearian (talk) 20:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.