Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sampoornesh Babu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Sampoornesh Babu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable actor yet and page seems bias. Apparently only 1 film so far (which was just released as well) Wgolf (talk) 01:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete One sentence article and one source. Nothing shows notability or significant coverage in reliable sources.204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:10, 14 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Hrudaya Kaleyam and fix either the spelling of this name, or the spelling of the name there. --j⚛e deckertalk 17:11, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article is completely promotional and coverage is low. Mr. Guye (talk) 19:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Neither of those is a valid deletion reason. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * My point was that the article has too little coverage to meet WP:NACTOR, and promotional material is not allowed under WP:DEL-REASON. --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:09, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The correct reason for your !vote would be "disregarding promotional material, there is inadequate coverage in reliable sources." Except you have a broader idea of "promotional material" than I do, and mine seems a little more extensive than the general WP:CONSENSUS.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 21:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:BLP. Essentially, this is an unreferenced biography, because neither source is reliable. Even if everything were true, it is so badly written and sourced as to require blowing up. Bearian (talk) 15:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources to even get a passing claim at notability.  Even if there were, the article itself has serious WP:BLP issues.  ♥ Solarra ♥  ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 02:51, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.