Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sampsonite "Emcee"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 19:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Sampsonite "Emcee"

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Same person covered earlier at Articles_for_deletion/Sampsonite_%28rapper%29; while there are statements of new releases, I see nothing recent conferring additional notability. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Although the WP notability bar seems fairly low for music artists, and he might be able to jump it, it doesn't seem like we need to have articles on people who are just starting out. BigJim707 (talk) 18:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep He has reputability from my research, all links and references are as described in the page, I see no need for deletion. PodiumGold (talk) 20:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * None of the references are things that connote notability; it's all material generated by the artist or his label, or in one case an off-site copy of a Wikipedia page. --Nat Gertler (talk) 02:14, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Non notable individual, all sources that I can find mentioning him have been user generated and do not establish notability. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 00:42, 18 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in independent reliable sources. The article pretty much says that this musician has yet to meet with success: "...the sale rate never met the deadline and he was forced to pull the album off the shelves", and "...both of which caught the attention of DJ's at major radio stations, although it was not put in circulation due to management issues". -- Whpq (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.