Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsung SCH-B100


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. The articles are found to not be notable, and to not meet the requirements of WP:PRODUCTS - specifically: "Avoid creating multiple stubs about each individual product (PU-36 Explosive Space Modulator, Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator, R-36 Explosive Space Modulator, etc.) especially if there is no realistic hope of expansion". &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 21:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Samsung SCH-B100

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:PRODUCT GoingBatty (talk) 18:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because they are similar stubs for the same series of mobile phones:

GoingBatty (talk) 18:40, 30 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong keep Then why don't we just delete all articles about mobile phones and cameras etc.? The fact you don't know these mobile phones and they don't have a commercial name doesn't make them irrelevant for Wikipedia. A lot of these mobile phones reached very high sales numbers, and there is a lot of information to find about them, I just didn't add that information (yet). That's why these articles are called STUBS. Kind regards, Coldbolt (talk) 20:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Strong keep - Not every phone made is going to be a success and not every phone made will have amazing sources, As these pre 2004 sourcing isn't going to be great anyway but searching "Samsung SGH 200" I've found a few sources, They're not great but you're probably not gonna get better than them. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:41, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all - trivial variants. WP:PRODUCTS explicitly says "Avoid creating multiple stubs about each individual product". --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Question Would it be worthwhile to start with an article about Samsung mobile phones instead?  (It currently is just a redirect to Samsung Electronics.) GoingBatty (talk) 21:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


 * That does sound a good idea but only problem is I wouldn't even know where to start, I guess not every phone ever made needs an article but being someone who loves the old stuff I can't say Delete, – Davey 2010 Talk 22:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it is difficult to start an article about Samsung mobile phones in general. You must realize that the Samsung SGH-Q105 isn't less important than for example the LG KM900, and that the Samsung SGH-Q105 is totally different from for example the Samsung SGH-Z110. As I said before, there's enough info to find on every single article, including all specifications. I should be given the time to expand them eventually. I was planning on doing it anyway sometime, that's why I created these stubs, but I wasn't expecting people making a problem of it. If you google these phones yourself you will find enough information, and Wikipedia doesn't have a size limit so I don't see the point to delete these articles and give people like me who are interested in these (old) technologies the chance to expand them in the future. Kind regards, Coldbolt (talk) 23:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Support having these articles moved to your userspace or to draftspace so that you could continue working on them. GoingBatty (talk) 00:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * delete the lot essentially just product listings in stubs. Maybe a list might be viable but that also smacks of being INDISCRIMINATE. Spartaz Humbug! 18:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.