Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsuri Arshad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Samsuri Arshad

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another civil servant who does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Currently sourced solely with primary sources. Searches did not turn up anything in-depth about them.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police, Law,  and Malaysia.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment that’s an awful lot of awards though…… The sources in the ms.wiki are rubbish, so no help there. I’m coming up with quite a few hits on a news search but really heed a native speaker to evaluate them. Mccapra (talk) 20:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Agree entirely. Atchom (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

I ready clean up some mistakes of this article, please go check out.

I wonder why this article put in delete nomination, can someone give me the reason Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment - - yes, but none of them by themselves, or as a group, meet any of the notability criteria. And the articles are not in-depth.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Well I improve the articles already, maybe can stop deletion.

I just added some reference about this article.

Are this article can stop deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Normal rookie (talk • contribs) 03:20, March 25, 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence in the article or in searches or this discussion that this article meets the GNG or any relevant SNG. Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 20:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

How can I improve this article meets the GNG or any relevant SNG  Normal rookie  TT me
 * , step 1 would be to read the General Notability Guideline and the Subject Notability Guidelines, particularly the Biography Guideline. Step 2 would be to read the Content Guideline on Reliable Sources. Step 3 would be to find reliable sources that could substantiate that this article complies with those guidelines. I don't think those sources exist but you can certainly try to find them. Good luck and I hope that helps.  Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 03:05, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks  Normal rookie  TT me 03:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.