Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Calkin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Keep Delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Notwithstanding the instructions to not edit an AFD after closure (in this case 3+ years ago), I have noncontroversially changed Keep to Delete in Crisco's close above. At the same time as writing his close, Crisco actually deleted the article (which has since not been recreated and is redlinked) and the AFD comments are 2 deletes (including mine) + the deletion nomination. Therefore I am sure Crisco meant to write Delete and accidentally mistyped the exact opposite above. I have IAR fixed it, just in case someone else would stumble on this and be confused just as I was. --Martinp (talk) 03:22, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Samuel Calkin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject Passes WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. Two-time successful candidate for local office. Has received many discernible significant coverage outside of routine campaign press coverage, such as being published in 9/2007 pg. 27-30 IEEE Spectrum for VPN standardization, then giving a keynote at IEEE Consumer Communications & Networking Conference main stage 1/9/2008 7-9 PM. Article in Texas Monthly, in as a potential candidate for state comptroller in 2015. Ddcm8991 (talk) 20:12, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete single independent source not enough, no indication that he saw anything close to success per WP:POLOUTCOMES... Boogerpatrol (talk) 17:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete"" per nom and Boogerpatrol (normally wouldn't bother, but since this AFD has few comments worthwhile noting that someone else has at least examined it.) Martinp (talk) 17:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). further edits should be made to this page.