Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Kane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 23:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Samuel Kane
Discussion to run until at least 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable as has not had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, or other productions as per Wikipedia:Notability (people) 89.242.25.0 (talk) 22:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Text copied from article talk page ➨ ❝ ЯEDVERS ❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 18:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The soap opera appearences are notable enough, these are major programs in the UK, regularly topping the ratings, and he had multiple appearances as named characters, which is singnificant. And there is a picture of him in panto, which is likely notable. Needs sourcing, not deleting.Yobmod (talk) 10:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails multiple sources test. Soaps may be notable, but not every "named" actor in them. --Bejnar (talk) 07:07, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

--Gsleith (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete According to imdb he appeared in only 4 episodes of Emmerdale and 3 of Coronation Street. Not a significant actor
 * Keep - One episode of Coro would be enough. It's history! Kipof (talk) 14:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Anonymous nom's opinion of significance does not reflect real world notability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.