Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel McBride Pringle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:11, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Samuel McBride Pringle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Clearly a genealogical piece about a non-notable junior officer in the Confederate Army. The article is almost entirely (bar a couple of sentences) sourced from unpublished personal documents and letters. Original research not suitable for Wikipedia. Sionk (talk) 15:14, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete An unpublished manuscript is not a reliable source. In addition, this person fails WP:SOLDIER.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  16:28, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Cullen. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:35, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Master Xandred (talk) 18:27, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 4 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Appears to be a family history piece. Non-notable junior officer. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:44, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  - dain   omite    23:26, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, no significant coverage of subject found in non-primary reliable sources. I understand that the reliable sources need not be available online, but that being said the subject of this AfD does not appear to pass WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, or WP:SOLDIER. Therefore, deletion is in order.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:25, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.