Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Roche


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Samuel Roche

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:SPORTCRIT #5, and violates the general criteria of WP:NOTDATABASE. All we know about him is his name, his nationality, and that he competed in the 1900 Olympics. BilledMammal (talk) 23:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and France.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gymnastics at the 1900 Summer Olympics, per WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE, WP:R and WP:CHEAP.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 08:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete we have no sourcing on him. Wikipedia does not have a grandfather clause. If we have no reasonable claim to notability, just the fact that someone once bothered to create an article on a person is not enough to justify keeping any record of the non-notable individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Oppose redirect as ambiguous; could refer to the junior squash player. BilledMammal (talk) 01:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom, redirect not needed. Not notable. LizardJr8 (talk) 06:25, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I couldn't find anything worthwhile, including a newspapers.com search Jacona (talk) 13:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.