Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Ross


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After much-extended time for discussion, there is a clear absence of consensus for deletion. Relisting appears to be of no value, as the discussion has been dormant for over a week, despite a second relisting (non-admin closure) Kichu🐘 Need any help? 15:34, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Samuel Ross

 * – ( View AfD View log )

An unnotable fashion designer and creative director. Sliekid (talk) 16:51, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sliekid (talk) 16:51, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:57, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:57, 3 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi Sliekid, I disagree. Samuel Ross is definitely notable, has been written about extensively in various news publications.   Electriclamb (talk) 18:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: Sockpuppet of Louisehynes11. See Sockpuppet investigations/Louisehynes11.  Not struck since the sockpuppeter was not blocked indefinitely.  ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 05:22, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - fulfills GNG, has significant coverage and articles. Article needs clean up however. Jooojay (talk) 17:06, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - Have not reviewed for general notability, but there may be conflict of interest. There is also a draft, Draft:Samuel Ross, and the draft is an autobiography.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been refactored. ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 05:22, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 05:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 05:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 03:15, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep based on the Vogue and Esquire coverage, these are in-depth and major publications. He meets WP:GNG. Webmaster862 (talk) 04:32, 27 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.