Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Woods (All My Children)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:51, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Samuel Woods (All My Children)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

The previous bundled debate resulted a no consensus; this is a 2nd nomination for that article. However, this character is not notable enough to either have a stand alone article or be merged into another article, such as List of All My Children miscellaneous characters. This article has only plot and no real-world perspectives (portrayers aside); he appeared for less than one year after first appearance. Whether major or minor does not matter, right? People, fans and non-soap casual people alike, have not been familiar with this fictional character, and there have been no efforts to establish this character's notability, such as of Olivia Richards, and to improve this article to achieve the "good article" status or the looks of the great, such as Pauline Fowler,, Erica Kane, or Luke and Laura. Are there reasons to overlook this article? Have people searched for this character? --Gh87 (talk) 01:24, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 19 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nominator. Neutralitytalk 19:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: The topic of the article, a fictional character, does not meet the general notability guideline. Also, the article itself is an unreferenced plot-only description of a fictional work, so a merge is not justified. Jfgslo (talk) 03:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.