Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel da Silva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Samuel da Silva

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Possibly could have been a speedy deletion, but as it went through the AfC process, decided on a full AfD. Cannot find anything in the sources here or online to merit an article. Edwardx (talk) 21:26, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nom. I'm surprised it passed through AfC. A quick search doesn't bring up much. Plus, the content looks more like a CV. Lunar Clock (talk) 05:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes, I'm also surprised this made the cut. Fails my efforts at establishing general notability guidelines. Missvain (talk) 19:56, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I guess AfC does not keep out all the rubbish articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - (Beware of other people of the same name when searching.) This article is clearly an attempt at promotion, and not a very good one at that. Full of non-notable personal trivia that even fans would find unnecessary. When I was a kid I lived with my mom too, but that doesn't mean I need to say it in an encyclopedia. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 21:18, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT, WP:MILL, WP:TOOSOON, WP:SIGCOV, WP:NOTRESUME, WP:SPAM. This page is such a mess that it can't be turned into a real article. This is very clearly an ordinary model at the start of their career. There is a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources; a few spreads is not enough. In 2020, everybody knows what a resume is and spam is; I can not longer assume good faith. Bearian (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.