Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel james mccrory jr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Samuel james mccrory jr

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This was tagged for CSD A7 but several medals assert notability and a Google search on the name suggests there might be sources, though I didn't found them directly. It is sufficiently fishy to warrant discussion instead of leaving it lying around unattended (which would happen if I merely removed the tag) Mgm|(talk) 11:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I Googled it and couldn't find anything at all. Can you show me some of the results you got? I suspect a hoax/vandalism (I realized I tagged it for A7 in error, but it was too late by than, I'd tag it for G3. Thanks! Peasantwarrior (talk) 11:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I found this, but that's just titles without actual articles to peruse. Hence me calling it fishy. - Mgm|(talk) 13:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per fishiness outlined by MacGyverMagic. That one website doesn't say anything, it doesn't even state who the person is and it certainly doesn't account for all the medals claimed in the article. Peasantwarrior (talk) 13:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of verifiability, possible BLP violations (especially relating to the subject's parents and step-family), and generally for looking like spam. AlexTiefling (talk) 14:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced, unverifiable. Edward321 (talk) 15:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone. JBsupreme (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless it can be sourced and cleaned up. Fails WP:BLP big time. §FreeRangeFrog 19:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.