Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Diego Wildfire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; neuro(talk) 19:47, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

San Diego Wildfire

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability. Notability is not inherited from the ABA, which is hardly a notable organization itself. No third party reliable sources. BrooklynBarber (talk) 19:34, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The ABA not notable? This team is obviously notable as even its players would pass WP:ATHLETE by playing in a fully professional league. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notability may not be inherited, but playing in a national professional basketball league is strong evidence of notability.  There's a difference.  Powers T 20:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Team of a fully professional national basketball league. Either stub it or fix it yourself, nom. SashaNein (talk) 21:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - A fully professional league, although with financial problems, is still notable. Bearian (talk) 15:10, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.