Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Francisco Fog Rugby Football Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete HappyCamper 02:20, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

San Francisco Fog Rugby Football Club
Despite being a "first something", eighty members doesn't seem like enough to make this club notable. -Nameneko 23:41, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Weak delete I'd probably say keep if the 'article' wasn't just copied from their homepage: http://www.sffog.org/. Anyway, don't know how things work in the US, but I'm used to clubs only having members who actually play for it, and not the general public, so I'd say 80 members is more or less okay by my standards for this type of club. Bjelleklang  -  talk 00:03, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as copyvio. The question is also whether an amateur rugby club playing in a local competition meets notability requirements. Capitalistroadster 00:48, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete 80 is a reasonably small number.  Traditionally, rugby clubs typically have many more members than actually play.  Ranks such as club captain are typically held by playing members, however, executive members such as teh chairman and secretary might not play in competitive games at all.  Not to be confused with the structure of professional clubs, of course.  Chris talk back 02:10, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Local amateur rugby group with trumped-up notability attempt. --Calton | Talk 00:16, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.